• Users Online: 174
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 83-90

Effects of different fresh gas flows and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity in surgical patients: a prospective observational study


1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey; Anesthesiology Institute, Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic Main Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA

Correspondence Address:
Ozkan Onal
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya; Anesthesiology Institute, Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic Main Hospital, Cleveland, OH

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.330691

Rights and Permissions

This study was aimed to investigate the effects of different fresh gas (oxygen + air) flow rates and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity when using the same anesthesia machine in patients undergoing general anesthesia. In this prospective, observational study, 240 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II between the age of 18–65 years to be operated under general anesthesia were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the fresh gas flow rate (3–6 L/min). Each of the two main groups was further divided into three subgroups according to the administered anesthetic gases and drugs. The resulting six groups were further divided into two subgroups according to whether the heat and humidity exchanger filter (HME) was attached to the breathing circuit, and the study was carried out on a total of 12 groups. The temperature and humidity of the inspired air were recorded every 10 minutes using an electronic thermo-hygrometer. The inspired temperature and humidity were greater in patients ventilated at 3 L/min compared to the 6 L/min group and in HME (+) patients compared to HME (–), regardless of the type of anesthetics. HME application makes the air more physiological for the respiratory tract by increasing the temperature and humidity of the air regardless of the anesthetic agent. This study was approved by Ethics Committee Review of Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine (No. 2017/261) in September 2017, and was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry (identifier No. NCT04204746) on December 19, 2019.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed996    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded130    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal